Evaluates gel-drug-PMS efficacy in enhancing wound healing in burn injuries, indicating promising treatments.
Severe burn injuries remain a major clinical challenge due to prolonged inflammation, excessive oxidative stress, delayed extracellular matrix remodeling, and impaired skin regeneration. This study evaluated the therapeutic potential of a drug-loaded porous microparticle composite graft (gel-drug-PMS) for enhancing burn wound healing in a hot metallic rod-induced third-degree burn rat model over 28 days. Animals were treated with gel-drug-PMS, gel-drug, or left untreated (control), and wound healing was assessed by visual observation, percentage wound closure, body weight, feed consumption, and collagen Type I content. The gel-drug-PMS-treated group demonstrated superior healing throughout the study. By Day 28, wound closure reached 76%, compared with 70% in the gel-drug group and 60% in the untreated controls. Visual examination revealed faster wound contraction, earlier granulation tissue formation, and improved re-epithelialization in animals receiving the composite graft. In addition, gel-drug-PMS significantly improved body weight recovery and feed consumption, indicating attenuation of the burn-induced hypermetabolic response and enhanced systemic recovery. Collagen Type I levels were markedly higher in the composite graft-treated group, suggesting enhanced fibroblast activity, extracellular matrix deposition, and dermal remodeling. The improved therapeutic performance of gel-drug-PMS is attributed to the synergistic effects of sustained antioxidant release, the extracellular matrix-mimicking porous scaffold, and bioactive peptide-functionalized microparticles, which together promote cellular infiltration, angiogenesis, collagen synthesis, and tissue regeneration while reducing oxidative stress and inflammation. Overall, the developed gel-drug-PMS composite graft significantly accelerated burn wound healing and improved both local tissue regeneration and systemic recovery compared with the gel-drug formulation and untreated controls. These findings highlight its potential as a promising bioactive wound dressing for the treatment of full-thickness burn injuries and support further preclinical and clinical investigations for translational burn care applications.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kumar et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: