Study tested a novel segmentation model for brain tumors in MRI, suggesting improved accuracy in delineation.
Background/Objectives: Accurate delineation of brain tumours on contrast-enhanced MRI remains difficult because lesions can be small, irregular, and weakly separated from adjacent tissue. This study developed BG-YOLO11s, a boundary-guided single-stage instance-segmentation model for T1 contrast-enhanced MRI. Methods: The public Figshare/Cheng dataset, comprising 3064 slices from 233 patients, was converted to YOLO polygon annotations and evaluated using a fixed 70/15/15 image-level split (2144/459/461 slices). Because patient identifiers were not retained in the exported image-and-polygon data, the split was not guaranteed to be patient-disjoint. Bézier Contour Augmentation generated two contour-perturbed training samples per original slice while leaving validation and test data unchanged. BG-YOLO11s extended YOLO11s-seg with dilated context aggregation in the backbone, boundary-enhanced feature fusion in the neck, and a prototype refinement module with differentiable boundary-aware supervision in the segmentation head. Results: In a single run on the held-out image-level test split, BG-YOLO11s achieved 92.4% precision, 88.7% recall, 94.6% mask mAP@50, 68.9% mAP@50–95, and 86.5% IoU. Relative to YOLO11s-seg, the corresponding gains were 3.8 points in mAP@50, 5.8 points in mAP@50–95, and 4.1 points in IoU. A progressive ablation produced incremental gains along the fixed module-addition sequence, but it did not isolate all component interactions or quantify run-to-run uncertainty. Conclusions: BG-YOLO11s improved single-run mask-overlap estimates under the present image-level benchmark. Patient-disjoint retraining, repeated-seed statistics, boundary-specific metrics, complete failure pattern auditing, and external multi-sequence validation are required before broader clinical or deployment claims can be made.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yurdakul et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: