Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Systematic review assesses functional outcomes of preservation rhinoplasty, suggesting it performs similarly to structural rhinoplasty.
Introduction: Preservation rhinoplasty is an increasingly popular alternative to structural rhinoplasty. However, concerns remain regarding potential nasal airway narrowing and the limited availability of objective postoperative functional data. Objectives and Hypotheses: To review and analyse current studies assessing functional outcomes of preservation rhinoplasty, with or without comparison to structural rhinoplasty. Study Design: Systematic review and meta analysis of functional outcomes in preservation rhinoplasty. Methods: A comprehensive database search identified studies using key words. Eligible studies that were included reported original quantitative data using validated functional outcome measures (NOSE, SCHNOS-O, VAS-F, SNOT-22, or rhinometry). Results: Twenty-two studies (n = 2058) met inclusion criteria. Controlled studies showed no significant difference between preservation and structural rhinoplasty outcomes, while uncontrolled studies demonstrated postoperative improvement from baseline. Conclusions: Preservation and structural rhinoplasty yield comparable functional results, both significantly improving validated patient-reported outcome measures.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chan et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: