Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
We analyze a class of modal logics rendered insensitive to reflexivity by way of a modification to the semantic definition of the modal operator. We explore the extent to which these logics can be characterized, and prove a general completeness theorem on the basis of a translation between normal modal logics and their reflexive-insensitive counterparts. Lastly, we provide a sufficient semantic condition describing when a similarly general soundness result is also available.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gilbert et al. (2015) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: