Key result
A consistent spline estimator was developed to estimate the conditional prevalence of a disease from group testing data with missing covariates.
Why the study?
Existing group testing estimators require complete individual data and fail to provide consistent conditional prevalence estimates when covariates are missing not completely at random.
The study provides new statistical estimators for conditional prevalence in group testing data when covariates are missing.
Complete-case analysis biases estimates unless MCAR; leaves open adjusted methods for nonrandom missingness in group testing.
We consider estimating the conditional prevalence of a disease from data pooled according to the group testing mechanism. Consistent estimators have been proposed in the literature, but they rely on the data being available for all individuals. In infectious disease studies where group testing is frequently applied, the covariate is often missing for some individuals. There, unless the missing mechanism occurs completely at random, applying the existing techniques to the complete cases without adjusting for missingness does not generally provide consistent estimators, and finding appropriate modifications is challenging. We develop a consistent spline estimator, derive its theoretical properties, and show how to adapt local polynomial and likelihood estimators to the missing data problem. We illustrate the numerical performance of our methods on simulated and real examples. Supplementary materials for this article are available online.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Delaigle et al. (2019) studied Infectious disease. Consistent spline estimator was evaluated. A consistent spline estimator was developed to estimate the conditional prevalence of a disease from group testing data with missing covariates.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: