Key result
Direct oral anticoagulants were associated with a similar risk of post-procedural gastrointestinal bleeding compared to vitamin K antagonists (16.2% vs. 16.4%, p=1.000) in patients undergoing endoscopic procedures.
Why the study?
Limited data are available regarding the risks of gastrointestinal bleeding and thromboembolic events during the peri-endoscopic period in patients taking VKAs or DOACs.
Does DOAC use compared to VKA use affect the incidence of post-procedural gastrointestinal bleeding in patients undergoing endoscopic procedures?
Observational (n=195)
Yes
Does DOAC use compared to VKA use affect the incidence of post-procedural gastrointestinal bleeding in patients undergoing endoscopic procedures?
Absolute Event Rate: 16.2% vs 16.4%
p-value: p=1.000
In patients undergoing endoscopic procedures, DOACs are associated with a similar risk of post-procedural bleeding as VKAs but significantly shorten hospital stay.
Similar bleeding risk with DOACs versus VKAs post-endoscopy; supports safety equivalence but leaves open need for RCTs before practice change.
Background and study aims An increasing number of patients have been using anticoagulants including anti-vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) and direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs); however, in patients using anticoagulants, limited data are available with regard to the risks of gastrointestinal bleeding and thromboembolic events during the peri-endoscopic period. We aimed to evaluate the peri-endoscopic bleeding and thrombotic risks in patients administered VKAs or DOACs. Patients and methods Consecutive patients using anticoagulants who underwent endoscopic biopsy, mucosal resection, or submucosal dissection were prospectively enrolled across 11 hospitals. The primary outcome assessed was difference in incidence of post-procedural gastrointestinal bleeding in patients using VKAs and DOACs. Duration of hospitalization and peri-procedural thromboembolic events were also compared. Results We enrolled 174 patients using VKAs and 37 using DOACs. In total, 16 patients using VKA were excluded from the analysis because of cancellation of endoscopic procedures and contraindications to the use of DOACs; 128 (81 %) patients using VKAs and 17 (46 %) using DOACs received heparin-bridging therapy (HB). The rate of post-procedural gastrointestinal bleeding in DOAC users was similar to that in VKA users (16.2 % vs. 16.4 %, P = 1.000). Duration of hospitalization was significantly longer in patients using VKAs than in those using DOACs (median 15 vs. 7 days, P < 0.0001). Myocardial infarction occurred during pre-endoscopic HB in one patient using VKAs. Conclusion DOAC administration showed similar post-procedural gastrointestinal bleeding risk to VKA administration in patients undergoing endoscopic procedures, but it shortened the hospital stay.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Inoue et al. (2019) conducted an observational in Patients using anticoagulants undergoing endoscopic procedures (n=195). Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) vs. Vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) was evaluated on Incidence of post-procedural gastrointestinal bleeding within 30 days (p=1.000). Direct oral anticoagulants were associated with a similar risk of post-procedural gastrointestinal bleeding compared to vitamin K antagonists (16.2% vs. 16.4%, p=1.000) in patients undergoing endoscopic procedures.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: