Key result
CT coronal and short axis maximal dimensions were systematically larger than TTE (mean 2 mm larger, p<0.001), while CT cusp to commissure measurements were smaller.
Why the study?
The study assessed different CT aortic root measurements and their relationship to transthoracic echocardiography.
Do different CT aortic root measurement planes yield systematically different dimensions compared to transthoracic echocardiography in patients with tricuspid aortic roots?
Cross-Sectional (n=70)
Do different CT aortic root measurement planes yield systematically different dimensions compared to transthoracic echocardiography in patients with tricuspid aortic roots?
Mean Difference: 2
p-value: p=<0.001
CT aortic root measurements differ systematically from TTE depending on the plane used, emphasizing the need for standardized reporting of the specific CT plane and dimension.
CT short-axis aortic root measurements show high reproducibility; leaves open optimal standardization versus TTE in routine practice.
Objective: We sought to assess the different CT aortic root measurements and determine their relationship to transthoracic echocardiography (TTE). Methods: TTE and ECG-gated CT images were reviewed from 70 consecutive patients (mean age 54 ± 18 years; 67% male) with tricuspid aortic roots (trileaflet aortic valves) between Nov 2009 and Dec 2013. Three CT planes (coronal, short axis en face and three-chamber) were used for measurement of nine linear dimensions. TTE aortic root dimension was measured as per guidelines from the parasternal long axis view. Results: All CT short axis measurements of the aortic root had excellent reproducibility (intraclass correlation coefficient, ICC 0.96–0.99), while coronal and three-chamber planes had lower reproducibility with ICC 0.90 (95% CI 0.84–0.94) and ICC 0.92 (0.87–0.95) respectively. CT coronal and short axis maximal dimensions were systematically larger than TTE (mean 2 mm larger, p < 0.001), while CT cusp to commissure measurements were systematically smaller (CT RCC-comm mean 2 mm smaller than TTE, p < 0.001). All CT short axis measurements had excellent correlation with aortic root area with CT short axis maximal dimension marginally better than the rest (Pearson’s R 0.97). Conclusion: Systematic differences exist between CT and TTE dependent on the CT plane of measurement. All CT short axis measurements of the aortic root had excellent reproducibility and correlation with aortic root area with maximal dimension appearing marginally better than the rest. Our findings highlight the importance of specifying the chosen plane of aortic root measurement on CT. Advances in knowledge: Systematic differences in aortic root dimension exist between TTE and the various CT measurement planes. CT coronal and short axis maximal dimensions were systematically larger than TTE, while CT cusp to commissure measurements were smaller. CT readers should indicate the plane of measurement and the specific linear dimension to avoid ambiguity in follow-up and comparison.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Leong et al. (2021) conducted a cross-sectional in Tricuspid aortic roots (n=70). CT aortic root measurement vs. Transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) was evaluated on Aortic root dimension (mean 2 mm larger, p=<0.001). CT coronal and short axis maximal dimensions were systematically larger than TTE (mean 2 mm larger, p<0.001), while CT cusp to commissure measurements were smaller.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: