Key result
Excessive operating room traffic and door openings disrupt intended airflow and increase airborne bacterial counts, potentially leading to surgical site infections.
Why the study?
Does limiting excessive movement and traffic in the operating room reduce surgical site infections?
Does limiting excessive movement and traffic in the operating room reduce surgical site infections?
Limiting operating room traffic and door openings may reduce airborne contamination and subsequent surgical site infections.
Surgical wound contamination leading to surgical site infection can result from disruption of the intended airflow in the operating room (OR). When personnel enter and exit the OR, or create unnecessary movement and traffic during the procedure, the intended airflow in the vicinity of the open wound becomes disrupted and does not adequately remove airborne contaminants from the sterile field. An increase in the bacterial counts of airborne microorganisms is noted during increased activity levels within the OR. Researchers have studied OR traffic and door openings as a determinant of air contamination. During a surgical procedure the door to the operating room may be open as long as 20 minutes out of each surgical hour during critical procedures involving implants. Interventions into limiting excessive movement and traffic in the OR may lead to reductions in surgical site infections in select populations.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pokrywka et al. (2013) conducted a review in Surgical wound contamination and surgical site infection. Operating room traffic and door openings was evaluated on Airborne contaminants and surgical site infection. Excessive operating room traffic and door openings disrupt intended airflow and increase airborne bacterial counts, potentially leading to surgical site infections.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: