Key result
Higher resting heart rate variability was associated with greater declines in intrusive thoughts among participants instructed to suppress them, compared to a control condition.
Why the study?
Does resting heart rate variability moderate the success of thought suppression in individuals?
RCT
Does resting heart rate variability moderate the success of thought suppression in individuals?
Higher resting heart rate variability is associated with greater success in suppressing unwanted thoughts, highlighting a link between autonomic regulation and cognitive control.
May index self-regulatory capacity in suppression tasks; hypothesis-generating and should not yet change practice.
Individual differences in heart rate variability (HRV) at rest are thought to represent an individual's capacity for self-regulation, but it remains unclear whether HRV predicts control over unwanted thoughts. The current study used a thought suppression paradigm in which participants recorded occurrences of a personally relevant intrusive thought over three monitoring periods. Among those instructed to suppress, higher levels of HRV were associated with greater declines in intrusions across the monitoring periods; no such relationship was found among those assigned to a control condition. Resting HRV also interacted with spontaneous thought suppression effort to predict intrusive thought frequency. In both cases, these HRV-related differences in thought suppression success predicted the generalized distress symptoms common to depression and anxiety. These findings enhance understanding of the relationships between HRV and cognitive control and highlight how individual differences in self-regulatory capacity impact thought suppression success and emotion regulation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gillie et al. (2015) reported an RCT. Thought suppression instruction vs. Control condition was evaluated on Occurrences of a personally relevant intrusive thought. Higher resting heart rate variability was associated with greater declines in intrusive thoughts among participants instructed to suppress them, compared to a control condition.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: