Key result
Greater self-silencing in intimate relationships was associated with a 16% increased odds of having a carotid plaque index ≥2 for each additional point on the subscale (OR 1.16).
Why the study?
Self-silencing has been linked to poor mental and self-reported physical health in women, but had not been examined in relation to cardiovascular health using direct vascular measures.
Does self-silencing in intimate relationships increase the risk of carotid atherosclerosis in midlife women?
Cross-Sectional (n=290)
Does self-silencing in intimate relationships increase the risk of carotid atherosclerosis in midlife women?
Self-silencing in intimate relationships is associated with increased odds of carotid plaque in midlife women, independent of standard cardiovascular risk factors and depression.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Self-silencing may mark higher subclinical atherosclerosis risk; hypothesis-generating and should not yet change practice.
BACKGROUND: Individuals engage in a range of behaviors to maintain close relationships. One behavior is self-silencing or inhibiting self-expression to avoid relationship conflict or loss. Self-silencing is related to poor mental health and self-reported physical health in women but has not been examined in relation to cardiovascular health, particularly using direct measures of the vasculature. PURPOSE: To test associations between self-silencing and carotid atherosclerosis in midlife women; secondary analyses examined moderation by race/ethnicity. METHODS: Women (N = 290, ages 40-60) reported on self-silencing in intimate relationships and underwent physical measurements, blood draw, and ultrasound assessment of carotid intima-media thickness (IMT) and plaque. Associations between self-silencing and mean IMT and plaque index (0, 1, ≥2) were tested in linear regression and multinomial logistic regression models, respectively, followed by interaction terms between self-silencing and race, adjusted for demographic factors, CVD risk factors, partner status, depression, physical activity, and diet. RESULTS: Forty-seven percent of women demonstrated carotid plaque. Greater self-silencing was related to increased odds of plaque index ≥2 (e.g., for each additional point, odds ratio [95% confidence interval] = 1.16 [1.03-1.31], p = .012), relative to no plaque). Moderation analyses indicated that self-silencing was related to odds of plaque index ≥2 in non-white women (1.15 [1.05-1.26], p = .004), but there was no significant relationship in white women (1.01 [0.97-1.06], p = .550). No associations emerged for IMT. CONCLUSIONS: Among midlife women, self-silencing was associated with carotid plaque, independent of CVD risk factors, depression, and health behaviors. Emotional expression in relationships may be important for women's cardiovascular health.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jakubowski et al. (2021) conducted a cross-sectional in Carotid atherosclerosis (n=290). Self-silencing vs. Lower self-silencing was evaluated on Carotid plaque index ≥2 (relative to no plaque) (OR 1.16, 95% CI 1.03-1.31, p=0.012). Greater self-silencing in intimate relationships was associated with a 16% increased odds of having a carotid plaque index ≥2 for each additional point on the subscale (OR 1.16).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: