Key result
Men with nonobstructive coronary artery disease had a significantly higher risk of myocardial ischemia per cardiopulmonary exercise testing compared to women (OR 3.14; 95% CI 1.78-5.54; p<0.0001).
Why the study?
Nonobstructive coronary artery disease is common but less well understood, and few studies have analyzed gender differences in inducible myocardial ischemia assessed by cardiopulmonary exercise test.
Do men with nonobstructive coronary artery disease have a higher burden of inducible myocardial ischemia detected by cardiopulmonary exercise testing compared to women?
Observational (n=289)
Do men with nonobstructive coronary artery disease have a higher burden of inducible myocardial ischemia detected by cardiopulmonary exercise testing compared to women?
May support sex-stratified ischemia assessment in nonobstructive CAD; leaves open need for prospective outcome trials.
Background Nonobstructive coronary artery disease (NOCAD), characterized by the presence of myocardial ischemic symptoms and signs without obstructive coronaries, is a common clinical condition, but it is less well understood. Few studies have analyzed the gender differences in inducible myocardial ischemia assessed by cardiopulmonary exercise test (CPET) in NOCAD. Methods We conducted a study of 289 NOCAD patients (mean age 60, 56% women) with ischemic symptoms and confirmed ⫹50% coronaries stenoses by coronary angiography who underwent symptom‐limited CPET. We assessed ischemic response using predicted % peak VO 2 , O 2 pulse trajectory, and exercise ECG test. Results Men with NOCAD had significantly lower predicted % peak VO 2 (62% vs. 73%), higher proportions of flattening pattern (16% vs. 2%), and downward patterns of O 2 pulse trajectory (2% vs. 0%) ( p < .0001) compared with women. In contrast, women with NOCAD had a higher prevalence of shallow patterns of O 2 pulse trajectory (21% vs. 6%, p < .0001). Men with NOCAD had a higher risk ischemic profile (medium risk: 63% vs. 54%, high risk: 18% vs. 4%, p < .0001). After adjustment, men with NOCAD had significantly lower predicted % peak VO 2 (β −27.4, 95% CI −30.74 to −24.07), higher risk for abnormal O 2 pulse trajectories (OR 4.21, 95% CI 1.93 to 9.19), and myocardial ischemia risk per CPET parameters (OR 3.14, 95% CI 1.78 to 5.54) ( p < .0001). Conclusion Men with NOCAD had a higher risk profile for ischemic heart disease per CPET. Therefore, they should receive rigorous management and follow‐up to prevent cardiovascular events.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Li et al. (2024) conducted an observational in Nonobstructive coronary artery disease (NOCAD) (n=289). Male sex vs. Female sex was evaluated on Myocardial ischemia risk per CPET parameters (OR 3.14, 95% CI 1.78 to 5.54, p=<.0001). Men with nonobstructive coronary artery disease had a significantly higher risk of myocardial ischemia per cardiopulmonary exercise testing compared to women (OR 3.14; 95% CI 1.78-5.54; p<0.0001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: