Key result
High sensitive troponin I demonstrated greater diagnostic efficiency for acute myocardial infarction at 3 hours versus 6 hours (AUC 0.91 vs 0.72).
Why the study?
Does high sensitive troponin I (hsTnI) improve the diagnostic efficiency for acute myocardial infarction compared to contemporary TnI in patients with suspected ACS?
Observational (n=426)
Yes
Does high sensitive troponin I (hsTnI) improve the diagnostic efficiency for acute myocardial infarction compared to contemporary TnI in patients with suspected ACS?
Absolute Event Rate: 66.7% vs 52.6%
High sensitive troponin I improves diagnostic efficiency and shortens the time to decision for acute myocardial infarction compared to contemporary assays, particularly benefiting women through gender-specific thresholds.
hsTnI raises troponin detection in suspected ACS; leaves open effects on diagnostic accuracy and outcomes.
We describe the adoption of high sensitive troponin I (hsTnI) in clinical practice in two hospital settings in Italy. Samples from 426 consecutive patients (mean age 68.8 ± 17.0) admitted to the Emergency Department with a suspected acute coronary syndrome (ACS) have been tested at admittance and after 3 and 6 hours by contemporary TnI and hsTnI. Results have been compared to the final clinical diagnosis. Troponin was detectable in 68.6% by TnI and 89.9% by hsTnI. Since hsTnI has a lower threshold for females, 38/41 patients with positive values only by hsTnI were women. The correlation between the assays was very high (r=0.92). A diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) was made in 45 cases (10.5%). The negative and positive predictive values for a 50% troponin variation at 3 hours were 95.8% and 66.7% for hsTnI and 95.0% and 52.6% for TnI and at 6 hours 90.3% and 100% for hsTnI and 88.9% and 78.9% for TnI, respectively. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis demonstrated a greater efficiency by hsTnI at 3 hours versus 6 hours (AUC = 0.91 versus 0.72). The main benefits of hsTnI are the adoption of gender-specific 99th percentile and the shortening of time to decision.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Croce et al. (2017) conducted an observational in Suspected acute coronary syndrome (ACS) (n=426). High sensitive troponin I (hsTnI) assay vs. Contemporary TnI assay was evaluated on Positive predictive value for a 50% troponin variation at 3 hours for acute myocardial infarction. High sensitive troponin I demonstrated greater diagnostic efficiency for acute myocardial infarction at 3 hours versus 6 hours (AUC 0.91 vs 0.72).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: