Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: We investigated the effect of hypothermia induced 1 hour after transient (2-hour) middle cerebral artery occlusion on the extent of ischemic cell damage in the rat. METHODS: Middle cerebral artery occlusion was induced extracranially by insertion of a nylon filament into the right internal carotid artery. Two groups of rats were investigated: (1) rats (n = 10) subjected to normothermic (37 degrees C) ischemia and normothermic reperfusion; and (2) rats (n = 10) subjected to normothermic ischemia and 1 hour of normothermic reperfusion followed by 3 hours of hypothermia (30 degrees C). All rats were killed 1 week after the experiment, and brain sections were stained with hematoxylin and eosin for evaluation of ischemic cell damage. RESULTS: Infarct volume in normothermic rats involved 20.9 +/- 4.6% of the hemisphere, whereas hypothermic rats exhibited a significantly smaller (P < .001) infarct volume of 11.1 +/- 2.7%. The numbers of surviving (or structurally intact) neurons within large sections of the cortex and striatum were significantly greater for hypothermic compared with normothermic rats (P < .01). CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that postischemic induction of hypothermia significantly reduces ischemic cell damage after 2 hours of middle cerebral artery occlusion in the rat, and that an interval of time of at least 1 hour after ischemia exists in which hypothermic intervention is effective in either salvaging or postponing irreversible neuronal injury.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhang et al. (1993) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: