Key result
Non-synchronized noninvasive ventilation compared to nasal CPAP did not significantly affect heart rate variability immediately postextubation in extremely preterm infants.
Why the study?
Does non-synchronized noninvasive ventilation compared to nasal CPAP affect heart rate variability in extremely preterm infants immediately after extubation?
RCT (n=15)
Random order
Does non-synchronized noninvasive ventilation compared to nasal CPAP affect heart rate variability in extremely preterm infants immediately after extubation?
Nasal CPAP and ns-NIV do not significantly differ in their effect on heart rate variability immediately post-extubation in extremely preterm infants, though HRV changes during ns-NIV may help predict extubation failure.
Should not yet change postextubation support choices; leaves open synchronization effects on autonomic recovery in extremely preterm infants.
INTRODUCTION: There is a paucity of studies comparing the physiological effects of nasal CPAP or non-synchronized noninvasive ventilation (ns-NIV) during the postextubation phase in preterm infants. Heart rate variability (HRV) can identify system instability before clinical or laboratory signs of deterioration. Thus, we sought to investigate any differences in HRV between those modes. METHODS: 15 preterm infants with birthweight ≤1,250 g and undergoing their first extubation attempt were studied immediately after disconnection from mechanical ventilation. Electrocardiogram (ECG) recordings were obtained while on nasal CPAP and ns-NIV in a random order (30-60 min on each). Time and frequency domain analyses were used to calculate HRV from 5-min segments of ECG. RESULTS: 12 of 15 infants were analyzed (3 were excluded for low ECG quality): 7 successes and 5 failures. HRV parameters were higher during ns-NIV when compared to nasal CPAP, but differences were not statistically different. However, absolute and relative differences in HRV values (all time domain parameters) were significantly higher in infants who failed extubation during ns-NIV. CONCLUSIONS: Nasal CPAP or ns-NIV provided immediately postextubation did not affect HRV. Interestingly, in an exploratory analysis, changes in HRV did occur during ns-NIV in the subgroup of infants who failed extubation. Hence, changes in HRV as early as 2 h after extubation should be further explored in larger studies as a potential predictor of postextubation respiratory failure.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Latremouille et al. (2017) conducted an RCT in Extremely preterm infants postextubation (n=15). Non-synchronized noninvasive ventilation (ns-NIV) vs. Nasal CPAP was evaluated on Heart rate variability (HRV). Non-synchronized noninvasive ventilation compared to nasal CPAP did not significantly affect heart rate variability immediately postextubation in extremely preterm infants.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: