Key result
Finite element simulations of coronary stenting have advanced to support device manufacturing and clinical planning, but require rigorous validation to ensure credibility.
Why the study?
Applying finite element models of coronary stenting in manufacturing and clinical decision-making requires adequate model credibility and validation with respect to associated risks.
Finite element simulations of coronary stenting have advanced significantly, but their application in clinical decision-making requires rigorous validation to ensure adequate credibility.
Facilitates computational stent optimization in manufacturing; leaves open prospective validation before clinical use.
In silico studies to perform structural analyses of coronary stenting have attracted the attention of many researchers in the last 25 years. As a consequence, the finite element models used to describe the fundamental elements of stenting simulations, namely the delivery system (consisting of stent and balloon), the diseased artery, and the deployment procedure have had considerable development, paving the way for the application of numerical analyses in both manufacturing and clinical contexts. Indeed, in accordance with the logic of the 3Rs (refine, reduce, and replace), simulations can play a fundamental role in developing new devices and as a support tool for training/education and operational planning activities for clinical personnel. However, the application of such numerical methodologies in the aforementioned contexts of use requires an adequate level of credibility of the models with respect to the risk associated to their use in the decision-making process. Within this framework, this paper proposes a review of the modeling approaches available today for in silico stenting of coronary arteries and a discussion of their actual or potential application areas. In particular, the attention is focused on the different levels of credibility required by the presented contexts of use with respect to the validation activities of numerical models developed up to now.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Antonini et al. (2023) conducted a review in Coronary artery disease. Finite element simulations was evaluated. Finite element simulations of coronary stenting have advanced to support device manufacturing and clinical planning, but require rigorous validation to ensure credibility.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: