Key result
Standardized finger cooling differentiates Raynaud's phenomenon from controls with up to ~81% sensitivity at 70% specificity.
Observational (n=297)
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
In 99 patients with primary Raynaud's phenomenon (RP), in 97 with secondary RP and in 101 healthy subjects, finger skin temperature and laser Doppler flux were measured before, during and after immersion of the hand in a 16 degrees C water bath. We determined the baseline value, the values at the end of the cooling period and after 12 and 20 min of recovery, the percentual decrease during cooling and the mean values during cooling, during recovery and during the whole test. Most of the finger skin temperature and laser Doppler flux parameters were significantly lower in females than in males in all three groups. There were no significant differences between patients with either primary or secondary RP. In both sexes, all test parameters (with the exception of the percentual decrease during cooling) were significantly lower in the patients with RP than in healthy subjects. With a diagnostic specificity of 70%, the sensitivity varied between 55% and 81% for the different test parameters. Although, in both sexes, finger skin temperature and laser Doppler flux values before, during and after cooling were significantly lower in patients with RP than in healthy subjects, the considerable overlap between both groups limits the diagnostic value in individual cases.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bartelink et al. (1993) conducted an observational in Raynaud's phenomenon (n=297). Standardized finger cooling test (immersion in 16 degrees C water bath) vs. Healthy subjects was evaluated on Diagnostic sensitivity and specificity based on finger skin temperature and laser Doppler flux. A standardized finger cooling test yielded a sensitivity between 55% and 81% at a diagnostic specificity of 70% for differentiating patients with Raynaud's phenomenon from healthy subjects.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: