This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
Background and Aim: Despite the variety of screening tests, the number of babies born with Down's syndrome (DS) has not significantly decreased. The aim of this study was systematically review previously published meta-analysis studies to identify the most efficient screening tests for DS during only the first trimester (FT) and only in the second trimester (ST) of pregnancy. Methods: tests. In addition, publication bias was assessed through Egger's and Begg's tests. Results: This study investigated 14 eligible and high-quality meta-analyses. Meta-analysis of 13 studies revealed FT and ST as the best stage for conducting serum tests, with a sensitivity of 0.824 (CI: 0.790-0.857) and specificity of 0.956 (CI: 0.947-0.965). Likewise, FT and ST were found as the best stage for conducting ultrasound tests, with a sensitivity of 0.882 (CI: 0.850-0.914) and a specificity of 0.95 (CI: 0.944-0.956). In addition, ST was determined as the best stage for carrying out ultrasound (US) and serum screening (SS) tests, with a sensitivity of 0.93 and a specificity of 0.93, indicating the highest sensitivity and specificity of US + SS tests in the ST than FT and FT & ST stages. Conclusion: The first and second trimesters (FT and ST) is the best stage for carrying out ultrasound and serum screening tests. ST was found to be the best stage for conducting US + SS in DS screening tests. US + SS tests achieved the best results for DS screening during the FT and ST of pregnancy.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Goudarzi et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: