Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Shows C-FCM diagnostic validity in non-Hodgkin lymphomas, suggesting quicker treatment decisions.
We evaluated the validity and accuracy of cytomorphology and multiparametric flow cytometry (C-FCM) in diagnosing oncohematologic disease in 223 consecutive lymph node biopsy specimens from patients with lymphadenopathy, from 2004 to 2007. C-FCM and histopathologic studies were interpreted independently by hematologists and pathologists, respectively. C-FCM detected neoplastic disorders in 133 samples (59.6%): 92 non-Hodgkin lymphomas (NHLs; 41.3%), 21 Hodgkin lymphomas (HLs; 9.4%), 19 malignant nonhematologic neoplasms (8.5%), and 1 multiple myeloma (0.4%). Sensitivity and specificity were 87.25% and 95.95%, respectively. Positive predictive value and negative predictive value (NPV) were 97.74% and 78.89%, respectively. Sensitivity and NPV were 94.79% and 96.81% upon excluding HL and malignant nonhematologic neoplasms from the analysis. Of the 92 NHLs, 89 (97%) were categorized according to the 2001 World Health Organization classification of hematolymphoid neoplasms with a concordance of 87%. The C-FCM study was significantly faster than the histopathologic study. C-FCM has high sensitivity and specificity, allowing for a valid and reliable diagnosis, especially in NHLs and enabling their subclassification. C-FCM is faster than the histopathologic examination, allowing for therapeutic decisions to be made quickly. However, in the samples in which C-FCM cannot establish a diagnosis, histopathologic results are needed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Colorado et al. (2009) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: