Key result
Tumour necrosis factor inhibitors significantly reduced aortic stiffness progression compared to conventional synthetic DMARDs (adjusted mean difference -1.02%) in patients with established rheumatoid arthritis.
Why the study?
Aortic stiffness index is considered a proxy outcome measure in rheumatoid arthritis, but its progression under csDMARDs with versus without TNFi had not been comparatively described.
Does TNFi combined with csDMARDs reduce aortic stiffness progression in patients with long-standing rheumatoid arthritis compared to csDMARDs alone?
Cohort (n=107)
Single-blind
No
Does TNFi combined with csDMARDs reduce aortic stiffness progression in patients with long-standing rheumatoid arthritis compared to csDMARDs alone?
Mean Difference: -1.02 (95% CI -1.581–-0.457)
Absolute Event Rate: 6.11% vs 7.13%
p-value: p=<0.001
Long-term treatment with TNFi combined with csDMARDs is associated with reduced aortic stiffness progression compared to csDMARDs alone in patients with established rheumatoid arthritis and cardiovascular risk factors.
TNFi may attenuate AoSI progression in RA; hypothesis-generating and should not yet change practice.
BACKGROUND: Aortic stiffness index (AoSI) has to be considered a proxy outcome measure in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). The aim of this study was to comparatively describe AoSI progression in two groups of RA patients on long-term treatment with conventional synthetic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (csDMARDs) with or without tumour necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi). METHODS: AoSI was evaluated by Doppler echocardiography at the level of the aortic root, using a two-dimensional guided M-mode evaluation. Eligible participants were assessed at baseline and after 12 months. Changes in serum lipids, glucose and arterial blood pressure were assessed. All patients who did not change DMARD treatment during follow-up were consecutively selected for this study. RESULTS: We included 107 (64 TNFi and 43 csDMARDs) RA patients. Most patients (74%) were in remission or low disease activity and had some CVD risk factors (45.8% hypertension, 59.8% dyslipidaemia, 45.3% smoking). The two groups did not differ significantly for baseline AoSI (5.95±3.73% vs 6.08±4.20%, p=0.867). Follow-up AoSI was significantly increased from baseline in the csDMARDs group (+1.00%; p<0.0001) but not in the TNFi group (+0.15%, p=0.477). Patients on TNFi had significantly lower follow-up AoSI from baseline than the csDMARDs group (-1.02%, p<0.001; ANCOVA corrected for baseline AoSI, age and systolic blood pressure). Furthermore, follow-up AoSI was significantly lower in TNFi than in csDMARDs users with an increasing number of CVD risk factors. CONCLUSION: Long-term treatment with TNFi was associated with reduced aortic stiffness progression in patients with established RA and several CVD risk factors.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Giollo et al. (2021) conducted a cohort in Rheumatoid arthritis (n=107). Tumour necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi) vs. Conventional synthetic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (csDMARDs) was evaluated on Aortic stiffness index (AoSI) at 12 months (MD -1.02, 95% CI -1.581, -0.457, p=<0.001). Tumour necrosis factor inhibitors significantly reduced aortic stiffness progression compared to conventional synthetic DMARDs (adjusted mean difference -1.02%) in patients with established rheumatoid arthritis.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: