BACKGROUND: Circulating autoantibodies (AB) against brain-antigens, often deemed pathological, receive increasing attention. We assessed predispositions and seroprevalence/characteristics of 49 AB in > 7000 individuals. METHODS: Exploratory cross-sectional cohort study, investigating deeply phenotyped neuropsychiatric patients and healthy individuals of GRAS Data Collection for presence/characteristics of 49 brain-directed serum-AB. Predispositions were evaluated through GWAS of NMDAR1-AB carriers, analyses of immune check-point genotypes, APOE4 status, neurotrauma. Chi-square, Fisher's exact tests and logistic regression analyses were used. RESULTS: Study of N = 7025 subjects (55.8 % male; 41 ± 16 years) revealed N = 1133 (16.13 %) carriers of any AB against 49 defined brain-antigens. Overall, age dependence of seroprevalence (OR = 1.018/year; 95 % CI [1.015-1.022]) emerged, but no disease association, neither general nor with neuropsychiatric subgroups. Males had higher AB seroprevalence (OR = 1.303; 95 % CI [1.144-1.486]). Immunoglobulin class (N for IgM:462; IgA:487; IgG:477) and titers were similar. Abundant were NMDAR1-AB (7.7 %). Low seroprevalence (1.25 %-0.02 %) was seen for most AB (e.g., amphiphysin, KCNA2, ARHGAP26, GFAP, CASPR2, MOG, Homer-3, KCNA1, GLRA1b, GAD65). Non-detectable were others. GWAS of NMDAR1-AB carriers revealed three genome-wide significant SNPs, two intergenic, one in TENM3, previously autoimmune disease-associated. Targeted analysis of immune check-point genotypes (CTLA4, PD1, PD-L1) uncovered effects on humoral anti-brain autoimmunity (OR = 1.55; 95 % CI [1.058-2.271]) and disease likelihood (OR = 1.43; 95 % CI [1.032-1.985]). APOE4 carriers (∼19 %) had lower seropositivity (OR = 0.766; 95 % CI [0.625-0.933]). Neurotrauma predisposed to NMDAR1-AB seroprevalence (IgM: OR = 1.599; 95 % CI [1.022-2.468]). CONCLUSIONS: Humoral autoimmunity against brain-antigens, frequent across health and disease, is predicted by age, gender, genetic predisposition, and brain injury. Seroprevalence, immunoglobulin class, or titers do not predict disease.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gastaldi et al. (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: