Key result
Off-label low-dose rivaroxaban was associated with an increased risk of ischemic stroke compared with on-label dosing in Asian patients with atrial fibrillation (HR 2.75; 95% CI 1.62-4.69; P<0.001).
Why the study?
Low-dose nonvitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants are commonly used in daily practice among Asian patients with AF, but the risks and net clinical benefit of off-label low-dose versus on-label rivaroxaban required evaluation.
Does off-label low-dose rivaroxaban increase the risk of ischemic stroke or intracranial hemorrhage compared to on-label dosing in Asian patients with atrial fibrillation?
Population
2214 AF patients aged ≥20 years treated with rivaroxaban at a tertiary medical center in Taiwan
Comparison
Off-label low-dose vs on-label dose rivaroxaban
Design
Cohort study
Authors
Loading...
May support individualized rivaroxaban dosing in Asian AF; leaves open need for randomized confirmation of net benefit.
Cohort (n=2,214)
No
Does off-label low-dose rivaroxaban increase the risk of ischemic stroke or intracranial hemorrhage compared to on-label dosing in Asian patients with atrial fibrillation?
Hazard Ratio: 2.75 (95% CI 1.62–4.69)
p-value: p=<0.001
Off-label low-dose rivaroxaban in Asian patients with atrial fibrillation is associated with a significantly higher risk of ischemic stroke without reducing intracranial hemorrhage compared to on-label dosing.
Cheng et al. (2019) conducted a cohort in Atrial Fibrillation (n=2,214). Off-label low-dose rivaroxaban vs. On-label dose rivaroxaban was evaluated on Ischemic stroke (HR 2.75, 95% CI 1.62-4.69, p=<0.001). Off-label low-dose rivaroxaban was associated with an increased risk of ischemic stroke compared with on-label dosing in Asian patients with atrial fibrillation (HR 2.75; 95% CI 1.62-4.69; P<0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: