Key result
Implementation of a rapid response system reduced cardiac arrests by 57% (a reduction of 5.6 arrests per 1000 hospital discharges, P<0.01) compared with the preintervention period.
Why the study?
Does the implementation of a rapid response system reduce cardiac arrests and mortality in hospitalized veterans?
Observational
No
Does the implementation of a rapid response system reduce cardiac arrests and mortality in hospitalized veterans?
Effect estimate: 57% reduction
p-value: p=< 0.01
Implementation of a rapid response system with a physician-led medical emergency team significantly reduced hospital-wide cardiac arrests in a US Veterans Affairs hospital.
May reduce cardiac arrests in veterans; leaves open mortality impact and generalizability pending randomized data.
BACKGROUND: We sought to determine the impact of a rapid response system on cardiac arrest rates and mortality in a United States veteran population. METHODS: We describe a prospective analysis of cardiac arrests in 9 months before and 27 months after institution of a rapid response system, and retrospective analysis of mortality 3.5 years before the intervention and 27 months after the intervention. The study included all inpatients from a university-affiliated United States Veterans Affairs Medical Center, before and after implementation of a rapid response system, including an educational program, patient calling criteria, and a physician-led medical emergency team. Primary end points were hospital-wide cardiac arrests and mortality rates normalized to hospital discharges. Comparisons of event rates between various time points during the implementation process were made by analysis of variance. RESULTS: Three hundred seventy-eight calls were made to the medical emergency team in the time period studied. Compared with preintervention time points, cardiac arrests were reduced by 57%, amounting to a reduction of 5.6 cardiac arrests per 1000 hospital discharges (P < 0.01). Mortality was reduced during the intervention, but this was attributable to a natural decrease occurring over all phases of the study. CONCLUSIONS: A significant reduction in the rate of cardiac arrests was realized with this intervention, as well as a trend toward lower mortality. We estimate that 51 arrests were prevented in the timeframe studied. Our results suggest that further reductions in morbidity can be realized by expansion of rapid response systems throughout the Veterans Affairs network.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lighthall et al. (2010) conducted an observational in Inpatients at risk of cardiac arrest. Rapid response system vs. Preintervention period was evaluated on Hospital-wide cardiac arrests and mortality rates normalized to hospital discharges (57% reduction, p=< 0.01). Implementation of a rapid response system reduced cardiac arrests by 57% (a reduction of 5.6 arrests per 1000 hospital discharges, P<0.01) compared with the preintervention period.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: