Key result
An interdisciplinary group at a large academic cancer center developed and pilot-tested an outcome and variance tracking tool for non-surgical procedures and sedation.
Describes the development and pilot testing of a performance improvement tool for tracking outcomes and variances in sedation and non-surgical procedures at a cancer center.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May support tracking tools for sedation outcomes in procedures; leaves open multicenter validation.
A large academic cancer center devised a performance improvement plan for special procedures and sedation. A group of interdisciplinary professionals convened to address data collection, complications, and outcomes for non-surgical procedures and sedation. Administrative, medical, and nursing representatives from all areas in which these procedures are performed gathered to assess existing data and data collection methods and to develop an improvement plan. Gastroenterology, pulmonary, diagnostic imaging, intensive care, gynecology, genitourinary, hematology, and anesthesiology specialties were represented. The group was facilitated by staff from the institution's Office of Performance Improvement and co-chaired by an anesthesiologist and a pulmonary specialist. A representative from the Practice Outcomes Department was also an active participant. This article describes group process, design efforts, pilot testing, and analyses for this project. Pilot data are presented as well as a discussion of staff involvement.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gruber et al. (2001) studied Sedation and non-surgical procedures. Outcome/Variance Tracking Tool was evaluated. An interdisciplinary group at a large academic cancer center developed and pilot-tested an outcome and variance tracking tool for non-surgical procedures and sedation.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: