Key result
Greater travel burden to specialized cardiac care was independently associated with lower cardiovascular hospitalization rates, but not with cardiovascular prevalence or mortality after adjusting for socioeconomic factors.
Why the study?
Geographic access to specialized cardiac care varies widely, but how these disparities relate to population-level CVD outcomes remains poorly understood.
Cross-Sectional (n=7,770,000)
Effect estimate: β -15.1 (95% CI -20.2 to -10.1)
p-value: p=<0.001
Geographic disparities in cardiovascular disease prevalence and mortality are primarily driven by socioeconomic factors and age structure, whereas proximity to specialized care independently drives higher hospitalization rates.
Greater travel burden linked to fewer hospitalizations should not yet guide access policy; leaves open unmeasured confounders beyond socioeconomic adjustment.
BACKGROUND: Geographic access to specialized cardiac care varies widely, yet how these disparities relate to population-level cardiovascular disease (CVD) outcomes remains poorly understood. OBJECTIVES: The objective of the study was to evaluate county-level disparities in geographic access to specialized cardiac care and their associations with CVD prevalence, hospitalization, and mortality across Washington state. METHODS: We assessed county-level variation in average travel time and distance to facilities offering catheterization laboratory, coronary intervention, cardiac surgery, and emergency services across all 39 Washington state counties using publicly available data and the Google Maps API. Reliance on critical access hospitals (CAHs) was also evaluated. Age-adjusted CVD prevalence, mortality, and hospitalization rates were obtained from the CDC Atlas of Heart Disease and Stroke (2019-2021) and multivariable linear regression were used to assess associations between county-level accessibility metrics and CVD outcomes. RESULTS: = 0.41-0.43; both adjusted P < 0.01). In multivariable analyses, travel burden remained independently associated with hospitalization but not with prevalence or mortality after adjustment for area deprivation, rurality, and age structure. CAH-reliant counties had lower hospitalization rates but higher CVD prevalence compared with non-CAH-reliant counties (all P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Greater travel burden to specialized cardiac care was associated with higher CVD prevalence and lower hospitalization but not mortality. Socioeconomic factors most strongly predicted CVD mortality, suggesting that reducing geographic disparities requires addressing both care access and socioeconomic determinants.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Baglaev et al. (2026) conducted a cross-sectional in Cardiovascular disease (n=7,770,000). Geographic travel burden to specialized cardiac care vs. Shorter travel time or distance was evaluated on Total cardiovascular disease hospitalization rate per 100,000 Medicare beneficiaries (association with travel time to catheterization laboratory) (β -15.1, 95% CI -20.2 to -10.1, p=<0.001). Greater travel burden to specialized cardiac care was independently associated with lower cardiovascular hospitalization rates, but not with cardiovascular prevalence or mortality after adjusting for socioeconomic factors.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: