Randomized trial explores referral methods and engagement outcomes in primary care patients, suggesting increased effectiveness of warm handoffs.
Objective: The current study explored how and why primary care providers make referrals to embedded behavioral health clinicians (BHCs) and related outcomes. Method: Primary care patients referred to BHCs were followed for 15 weeks, across five student health centers. Results: Of the 7395 patients who attended medical appointments in the first 4 weeks of the study, 170 (2%) were referred to BHCs. Of these students, 126 (74%) attended at least one BHC appointment by week 15. The two most common referral methods were scheduling (58%) and warm handoff (35%). Patients referred by warm handoff were three times more likely to attend a BHC appointment than those referred through scheduling. Conclusions: The results provide multi-site data on how and why BHC referrals are initiated, how referral methods affect engagement, and BHC interventions delivered. Additionally, the results suggest that compared to other referral methods, warm handoffs increase the likelihood of, and reduce time to, engagement in behavioral health care.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Readdean et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: