Compares research performance of alumni and non-alumni faculty in business schools, suggesting non-alumni may perform better.
Faculty recruitment strategies, particularly the debate over hiring alumni versus non-alumni candidates, represent a longstanding concern in higher education management. This study investigates whether alumni or non-alumni faculty achieve superior research performance, drawing on human capital and social capital theories to explain potential performance differentials. Utilizing a unique dataset of 1,063 faculty members from business schools at China’s elite ‘985’ universities, we find that non-alumni faculty generally demonstrate superior research performance compared to alumni faculty. These performance advantages vary significantly across individual and institutional contexts. Specifically, non-alumni faculty working in broad-network disciplines show substantially higher research performance relative to those in other research disciplines. Moreover, the benefits of non-alumni recruitment are most pronounced in institutionally diverse business schools and universities located in first-tier cities. Finally, we provide exploratory evidence that non-alumni faculty exhibit broader research scope and more diverse collaboration patterns, consistent with human capital and social capital theoretical expectations. Our findings provide evidence-based guidance for business schools seeking to optimize faculty recruitment strategies and enhance institutional research capacity globally.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dong et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: