Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Shows lower right heart failure and delirium rates in blood-based priming during LVAD surgery, highlighting potential benefits.
OBJECTIVES: Cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) priming may influence hemodilution, bleeding and end-organ injury during HeartMate 3 (HM3) implantation, but evidence in contemporary left ventricular assist device (LVAD) surgery is limited. METHODS: We retrospectively analysed 92 HM3 implantations (2015-2025) by priming strategy (blood-based [FFP+RBC], n = 36; crystalloid, n = 56). Primary endpoint was postoperative right heart failure (RHF; INTERMACS). Multivariable regression and propensity score-based inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) sensitivity analyses were performed. RESULTS: Baseline characteristics were balanced between groups, with comparable age (blood-based: 58 [49.5-66.0]; crystalloid: 62 [55.8-68.2]; p = 0,069) and female sex (blood-based: n = 3/36 [8.3%]; crystalloid: n = 8/56 [14,3%]; p = 0.518). RHF was lower with blood-based priming (blood-based: n = 3/36 [8.3%]; crystalloid: n = 17/56 [30.4%]; p = 0.012; adjusted OR 0.23 [95% CI 0.06-0.86]; p = 0.030). Dialysis was lower unadjusted (blood-based: n = 4/36 [11.1%]; crystalloid: n = 18/56 [32.1%]; p = 0,021), with a directionally lower adjusted estimate (OR 0.30 [95% CI 0.09-1.01]; p = 0.053). Delirium was lower with blood-based priming (blood-based: n = 3/36 [8.3%]; crystalloid: n = 16/56 [28.6%]; p = 0,019; adjusted OR 0.22 [95% CI 0.06-0.84]; p = 0.027). Survival did not differ significantly (log-rank p = 0.055; adjusted HR 0.59 [95% CI 0.27-1.32]; p = 0.201). IPTW analyses showed lower delirium (OR 0.23; [95% CI 0.06-0.84]) and attenuated RHF association (OR 0.35; [95% CI 0.10-1.23]). CONCLUSIONS: Blood-based CPB priming was associated with lower RHF and delirium, and directionally lower dialysis rates, after HM3 implantation. Survival estimates were not statistically significant. Findings require prospective validation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bonni et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: