Demonstrates active engineering technologies improve urban rail planning outcomes, suggesting new environmental strategies.
This paper demonstrates how detailed acoustic micro-segmentation can serve as a vital decision-support tool, providing localized, evidence-based data required to effectively integrate environmental acoustics and foster community co-design in urban rail modernization planning. Furthermore, while physical noise barriers are widely praised as standard mitigation products in transport engineering, our analysis highlights their severe inherent limitations, including spatial constraints, high costs, and visual pollution, making them highly unsuitable for dense historical fabrics. As viable alternatives, we propose the implementation of active, source-targeted engineering technologies (e.g., rail absorbers, modernized track beds) alongside dynamic operational governance. To be effective, these alternative solutions must be sourced and embedded directly into the earliest stages of infrastructural project documentation. Ultimately, this paper demonstrates that evidence-based acoustic governance is an essential institutional pillar for long-term resilience, providing interdisciplinary perspectives that inform future sustainable transport policy and practice.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Vojtek et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: