Retrospective cohort study compares recurrence risks in different treatments for positive margins, suggesting curettage is preferable.
BACKGROUND: Positive margins of squamous cell carcinoma in situ or superficial basal cell carcinoma after Mohs micrographic surgery (MMS) occur in a small but clinically significant proportion of cases, with multiple management options available. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to compare recurrence-free survival (RFS) across different treatment modalities for positive margins after MMS to inform clinical decision making. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study of 422 patients with positive margins after MMS from 2012 to 2022. Recurrence-free survival was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier methodology. Multivariable Cox regression adjusted for age, sex, immunosuppression, tumor characteristics, and anatomic location. RESULTS: Among 388 patients in the primary analysis (306 curettage, 82 topical treatment), 3-year RFS was 92.6% (95% CI: 89.4%-95.9%) for curettage versus 82.7% (95% CI: 73.1%-93.6%) for topical treatment (p=.021). Topical treatment was independently associated with increased recurrence risk (adjusted hazard ratio 2.73, p=.021) after controlling for risk factors. Immunosuppression was the only other significant predictor of recurrence (adjusted hazard ratio 3.04, p = .036). CONCLUSION: Curettage demonstrated superior 3-year RFS compared with topical treatment for positive margins after MMS, with an absolute difference of 9.9%. These findings support curettage as the preferred initial management approach for positive margins after MMS when clinically feasible.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Khouri et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: