Retrospective analysis shows improved healing and reduced pain in chronic wounds with collagen-hyaluronic acid pads, indicating beneficial effects.
Background: Chronic wounds pose a persistent therapeutic challenge. Type I collagen and hyaluronic acid (HA) support tissue repair, but real-world evidence for describing their combined use in padformulations is limited. This study provides a real-world description of clinical outcomes observed within a tailored management, including Type I Collagen–Hyaluronic Acid pads (HCHA), on healing trajectories across diverse chronic wound etiologies. Methods: This retrospective observational analysis included 64 patients treated between 2017 and 2024 for chronic wounds, including burns (n = 32) and trophic ulcers of various etiologies (n = 32). Clinical data, including wound characteristics, daily healing rate (DHR), and procedural pain assessed using repeated VAS measurements, were extracted from medical records. Results: The daily healing rate (DHR) ranged from 3.22% in neglected burn wounds to 2.03% in non-burn chronic wounds. Percent area reduction (PAR) analysis at 7, 14, and 30 days showed greater wound area reduction in burn wounds (20%, 36%, and 62%) compared with non-burn wounds (13%, 25%, and 45%). Procedural pain decreased in both cohorts, with burn injuries presenting higher baseline VAS scores but following a similar downward trajectory over time (p < 0.001), converging to comparably low levels by day 30. Overall, the findings describe the outcomes observed within an individualized, multimodal wound care approach, which incorporates HCHA pads tailored to wound-specific characteristics. Conclusions: In this retrospective observational study, patients treated with HCHA pads as part of individualized multimodal wound care exhibited progressive granulation, favorable wound-healing trajectories, and lower procedural pain levels. Further controlled studies are warranted to validate these results and refine the patient selection criteria.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Stănescu et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: