Key result
Over two decades in Malaysian primary care, achievement rates for HbA1c and BP targets remained static at 30-45% and 20-50%, respectively, while LDL-C control improved from approximately 30% to 50%.
Systematic Review (n=109)
Scoping review identifies suboptimal management of key diabetes health indicators in Malaysia, suggesting improvements are necessary.
Background Diabetes is a major health concern in Malaysia, yet no comprehensive review has assessed the quality of care for these patients. This study aims to systematically review published evidence on type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) management in Malaysian primary health care (PHC), focusing on the achievement of glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c), blood pressure (BP), and LDL-cholesterol (LDL-C) targets (ABC control). Methods A scoping review was conducted, involving a comprehensive search of four databases (PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and MyMedR) and grey literature for publications up to December 2024. Studies were included if they reported on at least one ABC indicator among the general adult T2DM population in Malaysian PHC settings. The scoping review followed the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) methodology and PRISMA-ScR guidelines. EndNote was used for deduplication, and Rayyan was utilised for the screening process. Data were extracted and synthesised narratively. Results A total of 109 publications were included. Publications increased post-2010 but remained geographically concentrated in urban states. Large-scale studies heavily relied on the National Diabetes Registry. HbA1c was the most reported indicator. Findings revealed no evidence of improvement in HbA1c and BP control over two decades; achievement rates were 30–45% for HbA1c (<7.0%) and 20–50% for combined BP target (<130/80 mmHg). Conversely, LDL-C control (≤2.6 mmol/L) showed a modest improvement, with achievement rates rising from approximately 30% to 50% over a decade. Conclusion Despite a substantial increase in research, the HbA1c and BP control for T2DM in Malaysian PHC has remained static and suboptimal, highlighting a persistent gap between clinical guidelines and real-world outcomes. The modest improvement in LDL-C suggests that progress is achievable. These findings underscore the need for a balanced policy focus on all three ABC indicators, strategies to overcome systemic barriers, and continued investment in the national registry to guide evidence-based improvements in diabetes care.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Abas et al. (2026) conducted a systematic review in Type 2 diabetes mellitus (n=109). Primary health care management was evaluated on Achievement of HbA1c, BP, and LDL-C targets. Over two decades in Malaysian primary care, achievement rates for HbA1c and BP targets remained static at 30-45% and 20-50%, respectively, while LDL-C control improved from approximately 30% to 50%.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: