Retrospective analysis compares biomarker-targeted therapy outcomes in patients with unresectable salivary duct carcinoma, suggesting potential advantages.
Background Optimal treatment for non‐metastatic unresectable salivary duct carcinoma (SDC) remains unclear. We compared outcomes of upfront biomarker‐targeted systemic therapy and radiotherapy. Methods We retrospectively analyzed the Joint SDC Study Group registry. Thirty‐one patients with centrally confirmed non‐metastatic unresectable SDC were classified by initial treatment (radiotherapy or systemic therapy). Systemic therapy included trastuzumab plus docetaxel, combined androgen blockade, or chemotherapy. Progression‐free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were analyzed. Results Systemic therapy showed better PFS than radiotherapy (3‐year PFS 47.6% vs. 30.0%, p = 0.031) without OS difference. Trastuzumab plus docetaxel showed the highest response rate (75%) and enabled curative‐intent treatment in all cases, with the best PFS (3‐year 87.5%, p = 0.012). Conclusions Given the retrospective design and limited sample size, these findings should be regarded as hypothesis‐generating. An upfront trastuzumab‐based therapy followed by curative‐intent treatment may be a promising option for selected patients with HER2‐positive unresectable SDC.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kano et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: