Investigates eHealth literacy and health behaviors impacting quality of life in female college students, suggesting areas for improvement.
Purpose: To investigate eHealth literacy, reproductive health-promoting behaviors, and quality of life (QoL) in female college students and to identify the factors associated with QoL.Methods: The participants were 170 female college students enrolled at a university in Jeonbuk-do, South Korea. Data were collected from June 1 to 10, 2025 and were analyzed using the independent t-test, 1-way analysis of variance, Pearson correlation coefficients, and multiple linear regression analysis. Participants agreed to complete a self-administered questionnaire that included the administration of eHealth literacy, reproductive health-promoting behaviors, and WHOQOL-BREF (World Health Organization quality of life scale abbreviated version) tools.Results: The mean scores were 29.39±5.51 for eHealth literacy, 65.18±6.81 for reproductive health-promoting behaviors, and 3.58±0.66 for QoL. QoL was positively correlated with eHealth literacy (r=0.41, p<0.001) and reproductive health-promoting behaviors (r=0.39, p<0.001). Multiple regression analysis revealed that, compared with grade 4, grade 2 (β=0.40, p=0.012) and grade 1 (β=0.39, p=0.013), together with eHealth literacy (β=0.37, p<0.001), and reproductive health-promoting behaviors (β=0.34, p<0.001), were significant predictors of the QoL of female college students, explaining 31.0% of the variance (adjusted R²=0.31).Conclusion: The study results provide insights into how the QoL of female college students is associated with eHealth literacy and reproductive health-promoting behaviors. To improve the QoL of female college students, healthcare providers should consider developing strategies to enhance eHealth literacy and reproductive health promoting behaviors.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Seo et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: