Key result
A scoping review of 34 studies and 8 systematic reviews on HRV in outdoor contexts found that most reported increased parasympathetic (n=23) and decreased sympathetic nervous system activity (n=20).
Why the study?
HRV data analysis methods are varied and complex, leading to different approaches to data collection, analysis, and interpretation of results.
Systematic Review (n=42)
There is significant heterogeneity and lack of adherence to standardized procedures in studies using HRV to assess health outcomes in outdoor contexts.
HRV results in outdoor health studies warrant cautious interpretation; challenges robustness of autonomic findings and underscores need for standardized protocols.
Heart rate variability (HRV) is a psychophysiological variable that is often used in applied analysis techniques to indicate health status because it provides a window into the intrinsic regulation of the autonomic nervous system. However, HRV data analysis methods are varied and complex, which has led to different approaches to data collection, analysis, and interpretation of results. Our scoping review aimed to explore the diverse use of HRV methods in studies designed to assess health outcomes in outdoor free-living contexts. Four database indexes were searched, which resulted in the identification of 17,505 candidate studies. There were 34 studies and eight systematic reviews that met the inclusion criteria. Just over half of the papers referenced the 1996 task force paper that outlined the standards of measurement and physiological interpretation of HRV data, with even fewer adhering to recommended HRV recording and analysis procedures. Most authors reported an increase in parasympathetic (n = 23) and a decrease in systematic nervous system activity (n = 20). Few studies mentioned methods-related limitations and challenges, despite a wide diversity of recording devices and analysis software used. We conclude our review with five recommendations for future research using HRV methods in outdoor and health-related contexts.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
D’Angelo et al. (2023) conducted a systematic review in Health outcomes in outdoor free-living contexts (n=42). Heart rate variability (HRV) methods was evaluated on Adherence to HRV recording and analysis procedures and reported physiological changes. A scoping review of 34 studies and 8 systematic reviews on HRV in outdoor contexts found that most reported increased parasympathetic (n=23) and decreased sympathetic nervous system activity (n=20).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: