Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Background: Dysphonia significantly affects communication and quality of life, with its subjective impact often not correlating with objective laryngeal findings. Patient-reported outcome measures, such as the Voice Handicap Index-10 (VHI-10), are therefore essential in comprehensive voice assessment. However, the clinical utility of such tools depends on their linguistic and cultural appropriateness. Despite Marathi being widely spoken in Western India, a validated Marathi version of the VHI-10 has not been available. Objective: To translate the VHI-10 into Marathi and to evaluate its reliability among Marathi-speaking patients with dysphonia. Materials and Methods: The English VHI-10 was translated into Marathi using a standardized translation and back-translation methodology, followed by expert review. Content validity was assessed among 50 bilingual Marathi speakers. Test–retest reliability was evaluated in 50 dysphonic patients who completed the Marathi VHI-10 (VHI-M) twice over a 14-day interval. The study was conducted prospectively in a tertiary care ear, nose, and throat outpatient setting. Internal consistency was assessed using the Cronbach’s alpha coefficient, and test–retest reliability was evaluated using Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient. Results: The mean total VHI score was 14.64 ± 10.12. The VHI-M demonstrated excellent internal consistency, with a Cronbach’s alpha coefficient of 0.96. Test–retest reliability showed a strong correlation ( r = 0.95; P < 0.001), indicating high reproducibility. All questionnaire items showed good item-total correlation, confirming robust internal reliability. Conclusion: The Marathi version of the VHI-10 is a reliable and stable self-assessment tool for evaluating voice-related handicap in Marathi-speaking patients with dysphonia. Its use can facilitate improved patient assessment, counseling, and documentation of treatment outcomes in routine clinical practice.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gujrathi et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: