Experimental study compares ultrasound vein visualization to landmark technique for better cannulation success.
Introduction: Peripheral intravenous catheter (PIVC) failure prior to therapy completion is a major issue. Technology to identify more suitable veins for cannulation is essential to improve successful insertion and reduce post-insertion complications and avoidable costs. Objective: The experimental study was designed to compare vessel selection for cannulation when using a novel ultrasound-based vein visualization prototype versus traditional landmark technique. Methods: Three clinicians competent in cannulation (CCC) used landmark technique to select and mark a vein indicated for short peripheral catheter (SPC) placement on each arm of the 12 patients recruited (24 arms). This process was repeated using the vein visualization prototype. A blinded Vascular Access Specialist (VAS) evaluated each marked site using ultrasound (GE Logiq S7). Vessel cannulation suitability was rated on a 5-point Likert (⩾3 considered suitable). Ethics approval was obtained (SMHS HREC RGS0000006930). Results: Landmark-selected veins were deemed suitable less often (52.2% vs 78.3%; p = 0.08) than prototype-selected veins and had lower average suitability scores (2.57 vs 3.22; p = 0.03). Landmark technique selected veins from various sites: hand (4.3%), wrist (17.4%), mid-forearm (73.9%), and antecubital fossa (4.3%), whereas the prototype predominantly selected mid-forearm veins (95.7%). Landmark-selected veins were significantly shallower (1.83 mm vs 2.61 mm; p = 0.03) than prototype-selected veins, however the diameter of these veins were not significantly different between the two techniques (2.20 mm vs 2.72 mm; p = 0.05). Both techniques detected veins with 95.8% sensitivity. Conclusion: The prototype outperformed the landmark technique by visualizing non-palpable, non-visible vessels. The veins identified were larger and optimally located in the mid-forearm, both attributes linked to fewer complications and improved first-time insertion success. Future prototype refinement will include ergonomic improvements and clinical data to enhance performance.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Liddelow et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: