Key result
In patients with type 2 diabetes and stable CAD, CABG + OMT was superior to PCI + OMT for the composite of death, MI, or stroke (HR 0.71; 95% CI 0.59-0.85; p=0.0002).
Why the study?
There were scant outcomes data in patients with type 2 diabetes and stable CAD stratified by detailed angiographic burden of CAD or LVEF.
Meta-Analysis (n=5,034)
Randomized
Yes
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
BACKGROUND: There are scant outcomes data in patients with type 2 diabetes and stable coronary artery disease (CAD) stratified by detailed angiographic burden of CAD or left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). OBJECTIVES: This study determined the effect of optimal medical therapy (OMT), with or without percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) or coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), on long-term outcomes with respect to LVEF and number of diseased vessels, including proximal left anterior descending artery involvement. METHODS: A patient-level pooled analysis was undertaken in 3 federally-funded trials. The primary endpoint was the composite of death, myocardial infarction (MI), or stroke, adjusted for trial and randomization strategy. RESULTS: Among 5,034 subjects, 15% had LVEF <50%, 77% had multivessel CAD, and 28% had proximal left anterior descending artery involvement. During a median 4.5-year follow-up, CABG + OMT was superior to PCI + OMT for the primary endpoint (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.71; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.59 to 0.85; p = 0.0002), death (HR: 0.76; 95% CI: 0.60 to 0.96; p = 0.024), and MI (HR: 0.50; 95% CI: 0.38 to 0.67; p = 0.0001), but not stroke (HR: 1.54; 95% CI: 0.96 to 2.48; p = 0.074). CABG + OMT was also superior to OMT alone for prevention of the primary endpoint (HR: 0.79; 95% CI: 0.64 to 0.97; p = 0.022) and MI (HR: 0.55; 95% CI: 0.41 to 0.74; p = 0.0001), and was superior to PCI + OMT for the primary endpoint in patients with 3-vessel CAD (HR: 0.72; 95% CI: 0.58 to 0.89; p = 0.002) and normal LVEF (HR: 0.71; 95% CI: 0.58 to 0.87; p = 0.0012). There were no significant differences in OMT versus PCI + OMT. CONCLUSIONS: CABG + OMT reduced the primary endpoint during long-term follow-up in patients with type 2 diabetes and stable CAD, supporting this as the preferred management strategy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mancini et al. (2016) conducted a meta-analysis in Type 2 diabetes and stable coronary artery disease (n=5,034). CABG + OMT vs. PCI + OMT or OMT alone was evaluated on Composite of death, myocardial infarction (MI), or stroke (HR 0.71, 95% CI 0.59-0.85, p=0.0002). In patients with type 2 diabetes and stable CAD, CABG + OMT was superior to PCI + OMT for the composite of death, MI, or stroke (HR 0.71; 95% CI 0.59-0.85; p=0.0002).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: