Key result
Complete revascularization plus GDMT optimizes outcomes in diabetic patients with CAD.
Why the study?
Does complete and durable revascularization combined with guideline-directed medical therapy improve outcomes in diabetic patients with coronary artery disease?
Does complete and durable revascularization combined with guideline-directed medical therapy improve outcomes in diabetic patients with coronary artery disease?
Complete and durable revascularization combined with guideline-directed medical therapy is recommended to optimize outcomes in diabetic patients with coronary artery disease.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May support complete revascularization plus GDMT in diabetic CAD; leaves open confirmation by prospective RCTs.
Diabetic patients with coronary artery disease are common and complex, with an aggressive progression of atherosclerosis, increased rate of stent complications, and increased rates of incomplete revascularization in multivessel disease compared to non-diabetic patients. In this review, we first discuss the pathophysiologic elements of insulin resistance and presentations of coronary artery disease in diabetic patients. Next, we outline the evolution and present the data on revascularization strategies on diabetic patient outcomes. The overall conclusion of our review is that a strategy of complete and durable revascularization and guideline-directed medical therapy currently provides the best possible chance at closing the gap between outcomes in patients with and without diabetes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Martinez et al. (2016) conducted a review in Diabetic patients with coronary artery disease. Complete and durable revascularization and guideline-directed medical therapy was evaluated. A strategy of complete and durable revascularization combined with guideline-directed medical therapy provides the best chance to improve outcomes in diabetic patients with coronary artery disease.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: