Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Social inequities in health are shaped by interlocking systems of oppression that differentially structure experiences across populations and over the life-course. This study examines intersectional inequities in parental health one-year post-birth, focusing on the articulation of race/ethnicity, sex/gender, and social class. Using data from a French population-based birth study, Elfe cohort, we applied intersectional multilevel analysis (I-MAIHDA) to self-reported mental (SF-12 MCS) and physical (SF-12 PCS) health scores among 24,108 parents (mean age 32.8 ± 5.3, included in 2011) nested in 42 intersectional strata. Substantial intersectional inequities were observed in parental health in the cohort, with a more pronounced gradient for mental health than physical health. Inequities were primarily driven by additive effects, on average: racialized parents scored lower on both mental and physical health than non-racialized parents; women scored lower on mental health than men; and parents from less advantaged social classes scored lower on physical health compared to the most advantaged ones. The magnitude of racial/ethnic inequities was comparable to that of sex/gender in mental health and social class in physical health. Additionally, the protective effect of sex/gender on mental health seemed modulated by social class (significant interaction effect). We further open a critical reflection on how categorization choices shape the visibility of health inequities. These findings highlight how systemic forces-racism, sexism, and classism-jointly structure parental health around childbirth. They underscore the importance of intersectional approaches that account for the intertwining effects of social positions within society when studying population health.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Santos et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: