Key result
Pharmacological and mechanical thromboprophylaxis are effective for preventing venous thromboembolism in cancer patients undergoing surgery, according to current evidence and consensus guidelines.
Why the study?
What is the role and optimal duration of thromboprophylaxis for preventing VTE in cancer patients undergoing surgery?
What is the role and optimal duration of thromboprophylaxis for preventing VTE in cancer patients undergoing surgery?
Routine individual VTE risk assessment and adherence to thromboprophylaxis guidelines may improve outcomes in cancer patients undergoing surgery.
Supports guideline-directed thromboprophylaxis in cancer surgery patients; leaves open optimal duration and individualized selection.
Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a common, complex, and costly complication in cancer patients undergoing surgery. VTE risk varies with types of cancer surgery as well as patient-, cancer-, and treatment-associated factors. Current VTE preventive measures with pharmacological, mechanical, and combination of both are shown to be effective. Clinical questions remain and more research is needed, focusing on the role of thromboprophylaxis for minimally invasive surgery and major cancer surgery other than abdominal/pelvic surgery, as well as optimal duration of thromboprophylaxis in high-risk patients. Routine individual VTE risk assessment and better adherence to thromboprophylaxis guidelines may offer improved outcomes in cancer patients undergoing surgery. A summary of currently available evidence and consensus guidelines on the primary prevention of VTE in cancer patients undergoing various types of surgery is presented here.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Htun et al. (2017) conducted a review in Venous thromboembolism in cancer patients undergoing surgery. Thromboprophylaxis was evaluated. Pharmacological and mechanical thromboprophylaxis are effective for preventing venous thromboembolism in cancer patients undergoing surgery, according to current evidence and consensus guidelines.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: