Key result
The CAPE predictive models demonstrated strong performance when integrated into the electronic health record, achieving AUCs of 0.77 to 0.91 for hospital mortality and 0.69 to 0.71 for 30-day readmission.
Why the study?
Numerous predictive models stratify patients by risk of mortality and readmission, but few have been developed to optimize clinical impact while sustaining sufficient performance.
Does the Clinical Analytics Prediction Engine (CAPE) accurately predict hospital mortality, 180-day mortality, and 30-day readmission in hospitalized patients?
Observational (n=169,765)
Yes
Does the Clinical Analytics Prediction Engine (CAPE) accurately predict hospital mortality, 180-day mortality, and 30-day readmission in hospitalized patients?
Effect estimate: AUC 0.77-0.91 for hospital mortality, 0.69-0.71 for 30-day readmission, and 0.85 for 180-day mortality
The CAPE predictive models demonstrated good performance for predicting hospital mortality, 180-day mortality, and 30-day readmission when integrated into the EHR across a four-hospital system.
BACKGROUND: Numerous predictive models in the literature stratify patients by risk of mortality and readmission. Few prediction models have been developed to optimize impact while sustaining sufficient performance. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to derive models for hospital mortality, 180-day mortality and 30-day readmission, implement these models within our electronic health record and prospectively validate these models for use across an entire health system. MATERIALS & METHODS: We developed, integrated into our electronic health record and prospectively validated three predictive models using logistic regression from data collected from patients 18 to 99 years old who had an inpatient or observation admission at NorthShore University HealthSystem, a four-hospital integrated system in the United States, from January 2012 to September 2018. We analyzed the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) for model performance. RESULTS: Models were derived and validated at three time points: retrospective, prospective at discharge, and prospective at 4 hours after presentation. AUCs of hospital mortality were 0.91, 0.89 and 0.77, respectively. AUCs for 30-day readmission were 0.71, 0.71 and 0.69, respectively. 180-day mortality models were only retrospectively validated with an AUC of 0.85. DISCUSSION: We were able to retain good model performance while optimizing potential model impact by also valuing model derivation efficiency, usability, sensitivity, generalizability and ability to prescribe timely interventions to reduce underlying risk. Measuring model impact by tying prediction models to interventions that are then rapidly tested will establish a path for meaningful clinical improvement and implementation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Shah et al. (2020) conducted an observational in Inpatient or observation admission (n=169,765). Clinical Analytics Prediction Engine (CAPE) risk prediction models was evaluated on Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) for hospital mortality, 180-day mortality, and 30-day readmission (AUC 0.77-0.91 for hospital mortality, 0.69-0.71 for 30-day readmission, and 0.85 for 180-day mortality). The CAPE predictive models demonstrated strong performance when integrated into the electronic health record, achieving AUCs of 0.77 to 0.91 for hospital mortality and 0.69 to 0.71 for 30-day readmission.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: