Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This study evaluated the sorption of seven per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) across four synthetic soil horizons representative of biosolids-impacted soils in Maine. The experimental soil profiles comprised four distinct layers (Depth 1–4) with varying compositions, where Depth 1 represented organic-rich surface soils and Depth 4 was the mineral layer characterized by higher sand and clay contents. This design enabled controlled investigation of depth-dependent PFAS sorption. Sorption kinetics for PFAS were fit by the pseudo-second-order model (R² = 0.96–0.99), where PFOS exhibiting slower sorption than PFOA. In terms of sorption capacity, q e decreased from 2.08-1.54 µg g⁻¹ for PFOS and from 0.67-0.52 µg g⁻¹ for PFOA from surface to deeper soils, respectively. PFOS exhibited the highest sorption capacity at Depth 1 (qₘₐₓ=28.17 µg/g) while 90% less capacity of 2.10 µg/g at Depth 4. Across all depths, long-chain PFAS exhibited higher sorption capacities (q e =0.52-2.5 µg/g) than short-chain compounds (q e =0.001-0.74 µg/g). Overall, PFAS sorption increased with OM, PFAS chain length and hydrophobicity, indicating organic-rich surface soils acting as primary sinks, while mineral-dominated subsoils exhibited limited sorption capacity. These findings can enable vertical transport models where the mobility of short-chain PFAS and the depth-sensitive sorption behavior of long-chain analogues are crucial.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ghaznavi et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: