Key result
Childhood socioeconomic status did not predict IL-6 or CRP overall, but lower childhood SES predicted higher inflammation among adults with fewer psychological resources (≤1% variance explained).
Why the study?
The study evaluated race differences in how childhood socioeconomic status predicts midlife inflammation, and whether psychological resources act as moderators of this relationship among Black and White adults.
Does childhood socioeconomic status predict midlife inflammation, and do psychological resources moderate this association among Black and White Americans?
Observational (n=1,973)
Does childhood socioeconomic status predict midlife inflammation, and do psychological resources moderate this association among Black and White Americans?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Suggests psychological resources may differentially moderate childhood SES-inflammation links by race; leaves open whether interventions would reduce disparities.
OBJECTIVE: The current study examined race differences in how childhood socioeconomic status (SES) predicted midlife inflammation. It also tested psychological resources (purpose in life, optimism, and conscientiousness) as moderators of the association between childhood SES and inflammation among Black and White adults. METHOD: Data came from the biomarker subsamples of the Midlife in the United States Core and Refresher studies (n = 1,578 White and n = 395 Black participants). Childhood SES was operationalized as a composite of parental education, perceived financial status, and welfare status. Outcomes included circulating IL-6 and CRP. RESULTS: Childhood SES did not predict IL-6 or CRP among Black or White adults in fully adjusted models. Among Black adults with low optimism, lower childhood SES predicted higher IL-6 and CRP. Among Black adults with low purpose in life, lower childhood SES predicted higher CRP (but not IL-6). Conscientiousness did not moderate childhood SES-inflammation associations among Black adults. Among White adults with low conscientiousness or low optimism, lower childhood SES predicted higher IL-6 (but not CRP). Purpose in life did not moderate associations among White adults. Effect sizes were small (≤1% variance explained) and comparable to effects of clinical risk factors in this sample (e.g., age, chronic conditions). CONCLUSIONS: Race differences in the childhood SES and inflammation association were not apparent. Childhood SES was linked to inflammation more strongly among those with fewer psychological resources across both racial groups. Psychological resources may be important moderators of inflammation in the context of early life SES disadvantage. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Boylan et al. (2020) reported an observational. Childhood socioeconomic status was evaluated on Circulating IL-6 and CRP (≤1% variance explained). Childhood socioeconomic status did not predict IL-6 or CRP overall, but lower childhood SES predicted higher inflammation among adults with fewer psychological resources (≤1% variance explained).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: