Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Polyrotaxane networks were synthesized from a mixture of poly(crown ether)s ( 2 − 5 ) as a trunk polymer and dumbbell-shaped bifunctional secondary ammonium salt 6 bearing a disulfide linkage and bulky end caps as a cross-linking agent in the presence of a catalytic amount of benzenethiol via a reversible thiol−disulfide interchange reaction. Trunk polymers 2 − 4 were prepared by copolymerization of bis(hydroxymethyl)dibenzo-24-crown-8-ether 1 and comonomers. Poly(crown ether) 5 bearing a poly(tetrahydrofuran) (PTHF) spacer was also synthesized from 1 and PTHF with 4,4′-methylenebis(phenyl isocyanate) (MDI) in N, N -dimethylacetamide (DMAc) at room temperature. The treatment of these poly(crown ether)s ( 2 − 5 ) with axle component 6 in the presence of benzenethiol gave the corresponding polyrotaxane networks ( 7 − 10 ) in quantitative yields. We confirmed the cross-linking process by monitoring the 1 H NMR spectral change during the polymerization. Thermal properties, swelling, and dynamic viscoelasticity of these polyrotaxane networks were evaluated. Polyrotaxane network 10 bearing 5 afforded higher swelling and elasticity than those of other networks because of the flexibility of the trunk polymer as wheel components.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bilig et al. (2008) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: