This study compared the performance of normal-reading and reading-impaired children using time-compressed three- and five-word sentential approximations to full grammaticality, and the Word Intelligibility by Picture Identification (WIPI) test presented with and without pictures. Results suggested that reading-impaired children could be differentiated from normal readers by scores on these measures and by types of errors made. Theoretical and pragmatic implications are discussed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Freeman et al. (1978) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: