Key result
In patients with type 2 diabetes, there was no significant correlation between HbA1c levels and carotid artery intima-media thickness (r = -0.127, P = 0.127).
Why the study?
The study aimed to evaluate carotid ultrasonography, measure CIMT, and assess its correlation with HbA1c to evaluate CVD risks in patients with T2DM.
Does carotid artery intima-media thickness correlate with HbA1c levels in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus?
Observational (n=205)
No
Does carotid artery intima-media thickness correlate with HbA1c levels in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus?
Effect estimate: r = -0.127
p-value: p=0.127
In patients with type 2 diabetes, carotid intima-media thickness did not significantly correlate with HbA1c levels.
CIMT shows no HbA1c correlation in T2DM; leaves open its added value for CVD risk stratification beyond albuminuria.
Objectives: This study aimed to assess the role of carotid ultrasonography and measure the carotid artery intima-media thickness (CIMT) and its correlation with hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) to observe cardiovascular disease (CVD) risks in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Methods: In this observational study, 205 consecutive patients with T2DM from Golestan Hospital, Ahvaz, Iran, were included. We performed HbA1c measurements using high-pressure liquid chromatography (HPLC) with a thermo-system. Carotid arteries ultrasonography was performed with an Aloka SSD 5500 apparatus with a 7.5 MHz transducer. The CIMT was measured in the supine position with a slight neck extension. Results: There was no statistically significant difference between the two study groups in the duration of diabetes with CIMT (P = 0.425), while the differences in creatinine, HbA1c, and urine albumin were statistically significant (P = 0.020, P = 0.041, and P = 0.016, respectively). There was no correlation between CIMT and age (r = 0.19, P = 0.792) and duration of diabetes (r = 0.125, P = 0.081). Furthermore, there was no remarkable association between CIMT and weight (r = 0.12, P = 0.881) and FBS ( r = 0.062, P = 0.405). There was also a non-significant negative correlation between HbA1c% and CIMT (r = -0.127, P = 0.127). Conclusions: Ultrasound measurement of CIMT is a safe and relatively cost-effective way of diagnosing atherosclerosis. Thus, the ultrasound's predictive value as a safe and non-invasive examination may alert the related field experts early enough to intervene to prevent major cardiovascular complications.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sharokh et al. (2021) conducted an observational in Type 2 diabetes mellitus (n=205). HbA1c levels was evaluated on Correlation between HbA1c% and CIMT (r = -0.127, p=0.127). In patients with type 2 diabetes, there was no significant correlation between HbA1c levels and carotid artery intima-media thickness (r = -0.127, P = 0.127).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: