Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The surface passivation of SiO2/Al2O3stacks prepared at low process temperatures was investigated on phosphorous diffused n+-type Si surfaces with a broad range of sheet resistances. Two kinds of SiO2films were prepared, the first with plasma-enhanced chemical vapor deposition (PECVD) and the second in a wet chemical process. After atomic layer deposition of the Al2O3capping layer, the resulting SiO2/Al2O3stacks differ in the polarity of their fixed charge density, i.e., the PECVD SiO2stacks had a positive and the wet chemically grown SiO2stacks a negative fixed charge density. The PECVD SiO2/Al2O3stacks resulted in a high surface passivation over a broad range of sheet resistances whereas the wet chemically grown SiO2stacks were only feasible for diffused surfaces with low sheet resistances (<; 100 Ω/□). By corona charging experiments, it was established that the field effect based on a negative fixed charge density was the reason for the loss in surface passivation in the specific range of diffused surfaces.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bordihn et al. (2013) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: