Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Accurate cell-size determinations support the prediction that serum starvation and related whole-culture methods cannot synchronize cells. Theoretical considerations predict that whole-culture methods of synchronization cannot synchronize cells. Upon serum starvation, the fraction of cells with a G1-phase amount of DNA increased, but the cell-size distribution is not narrowed. In true synchronization, the cell-size distribution should be narrower than the cell-size distribution of the original culture. In contrast, cells produced by a selective (i.e. non-whole-culture) method have a specific DNA content, a narrow size distribution, and divide synchronously. The general theory leading to the conclusion that whole-culture methods for synchronization do not work implies that one can generalize these serum-starvation results to other cell lines and other whole-culture methods, to conclude that these methods do not synchronize cells.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cooper et al. (2008) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: