The purpose of this article is to examine the effect of the misuse and over-use of logical connectives (‘however’, ‘thus’, etc. ) in ESL undergraduate writing. It also points to certain types of mechanical exercises commonly found in textbooks as a possible source of the problem. A case is made against the practice of using logical connectives as mere ‘stylistic enhancers’—that is to say, words or expressions that may be sprinkled over a text in order to give it an ‘educated’ or ‘academic’ look. Rather, logical connectives should be seen as higher-level discourse units which organize chunks of text in relation to the direction of the argument. If the links are misused, the argument as a whole, not merely the sentence containing the connective, becomes difficult to process and may even appear illogical. Three suggestions are made to remedy the problem: firstly, limit the students‘ use of connectives to a small sub-set of relatively comprehensible ones; secondly, encourage the ‘phrasal expansion’f the connectives so that the logical links become more apparent; and thirdly, make consideration of the logical progression of the argument an integral stage in the writing process.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
W. Crewe (1990) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: