The structure of chemisorbed CO on the steps of Pt(112) {Pt[3(111)×(001)]} was monitored as a function of coverage by the digital electron stimulated desorption-ion angular distribution method (ESDIAD), digital low-energy electron diffraction (LEED), and temperature-programmed desorption (TPD). The ESDIAD method applied to the desorption of an electronically excited, neutral CO species (the metastable a3 π-CO state) avoids the influence of image potential effects on the trajectory of desorbing species, yielding true desorption angles, equivalent to Pt-CO bond orientations. CO adsorbs exclusively on step sites at low coverage with a 20° ‘‘downstairs’’ tilt from the [112] direction (designated ‘‘0°’’). LEED indicates (2×n) order (i.e., two-fold order along the steps but no order up/down the steps) exists when the steps are half-filled (about 0.19 ML). At 0.24 ML, CO is still adsorbed only on the step sites but one-dimensional CO–CO repulsions between nearest neighbors result in CO tilting along the steps. Terrace CO (+13°) adsorption is observed above 0.24 ML before all the step sites fill. All step CO molecules reorient with new tilt angles up (0°) and down (−38°) the steps when the steps sites saturate (0.53 ML), and (3×1) order is observed by LEED. The surface reorders at saturation (0.79 ML) to (2×1) order. Changes in CO desorption energies, pre-exponential factors and sticking coefficients with coverage in the literature for Pt[n(111)×(001)] surfaces can be directly correlated with structural transformations on the partially filled steps due to CO–CO repulsions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Henderson et al. (1989) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: